‘Nullification of immigration law’ seen as Obama legacy

"While President Obama’s critics on the left continue to call him the “deportation president” and rail about secret house raids on immigrant families, a new study shows immigration enforcement is actually at an alarmingly low rate. ICE deportations continue to decline this year and are on pace to be the lowest since 2006, according to the latest statistics from Immigration and Customs Enforcement. Deportations of criminals also keep declining, despite a nationwide litany of high-profile fatalities caused by criminal aliens, and despite the Obama administration’s claimed focus on removing deportable criminals, says Jessica Vaughan in a report analyzing the ICE numbers for the Center for Immigration Studies." –Source

As I said years ago on WTPR when I was broadcasting live on a few stations, the only reason the influx of illegal aliens from Mexico were being ignored at that time was because Rome had had control of the United States Government since Ronald Reagan's second term. Now yes, that's was a major issue because the Pope then had the power to manipulate Congress in a way that will benefit Rome from that day forward. Remember the quotes I share from time to time as to the fact this has been their agenda all along?

  • “It is the office of the Papacy to tread under foot kings and emperors.” J.H. Ignaz Dollinger, in The Pope and the Council, (London), page 35
  • "Democracy is a mischievous dream where the Catholic Church does not predominate." –Brownson's Review.
  • "There is one, and only one, sure democracy, the Catholicism of the Popes" -The Catholic World, Oct, 1937.
  • The old Protestant culture is about at the end of its rope Why can't we make the U.S. Catholic in legislation, Catholic in justice, aims and ideals?" Father F. X. Talbot, editor of America, official Jesuit magazine for the U.S. statement in New York Globe Dec. 14, 1930
  • "Religious liberty is merely endured until the opposite can be carried into effect without peril to the Catholic Church." –Bishop O'Conner of Pittsburgh.
  • "If Catholics ever gain sufficient numerical majority in this country, religious freedom is at an end. So our enemies say; so we believe" –The Shephard of the Valley, journal of the late bishop of St. Louis.
  • In the book Confusion Twice Confounded, Monsignor Joseph H. Brady states that the U.S. Supreme Court is wrong in decisions regarding "separation of Church and State." He says: "A sound view of the Constitutionin its relation to religion probably awaits a change in personnel in our highest tribunal." –The Register, Jan. 23, 1955.
  • "But Constitutions can be changed, and non-Catholic sects may decline to such a point that the political proscription [ban] of them may become feasible and expedient. What protection would they have against a Catholic state?" The State and the Church, pp.38,39, by Miller and Ryan, imprimatur of Cardinal Hayes.
  • "The Catholic Church in this nation must live on to accomplish her work, even though our Republican form of government disappears." –The Catholic World, April, 1935, p.12. "
  • They [Catholics] must penetrate wherever possible in the administration of civil affairs… all Catholics should do all in their power to cause the constitution of states, and legislation to be modeled on the principles of the true Church." –Encyclical of Leo XIII.
  • click here for more quotes

So as one can see, this is why Rome took Congress and then the White House in Reagan's day. Since that day they have had the power to play games with our laws so as to benefit Rome. In fact, when speaking of Ronald Reagan; was he not a Hollywood actor for decades before becoming president? And is not an actor defined as one who plays are part that is not his own? Would not an actor then be considered a professional liar? Is it any wonder that directly after the actor Ronald Reagan was elected as president we saw him appoint an ambassador to Vatican City? When W. Kenneth Dan was asked why we need an ambassador in Vatican City, (William A. Wilson) He replied; "It would allow the USA to influence the political decisions of the ROMAN CATHOLIC CHURCH!"

Many I'm sure believed at that time (1984) that having a Vatican ambassador would do the exact opposite of what Dan claimed, and now that it's been 32 years, me thinks if there were some that thought that way, they can now be vindicated in their thoughts that they were 100% correct. What I mean is, as one can clearly see with a Vatican controlled Supreme Court has allowed all sorts of proVatican agendas find life politically. Still, without the people in the nation behind the Pope in the polls, they won't be able to influence new and more stringent control over the now dwindling opposition still within Congress and other areas of the government. I believe this is one reason Benedict XVIstepped down among many other more sinister reasons. His failing popularity was causing Rome to lose big in the USA. Compile that with Rome's inability to contain themselves when it comes to sexual perversion on every level from raping children to each other, political corruption, and downright demonic obedience across the board, many Roman Catholics in the country are wising up to the fact that those they used to call "Catholic bashers" were in fact telling the truth all along and so they leave the church.

Not only does this mass-exodus cause the once loyal Roman Catholics to leave their church and even give up on Christianity altogether, what Rome fears more than anything else is those very same people that used to be loyal to them in the voting booths are now switching sides. And so the natural response to watching their precious voting block dwindling down was the idea to open the borders wide so as to allow for the uneducated and extreme loyalty of the Mexican people to flood in who have no idea how bad the Popes truly are because historic facts like this are not going to be shared in nations wherein the population is over 80% Catholic. Now do you see why the powers that be doing all they can to make sure noncitizens flooding into the USA can now vote? Those without indoctrinated thought processes ruling their minds know the overwhelming number of illegal immigrants that are flooding in from Mexico are in fact devout Roman Catholics. And yes, this includes the criminal element that seems to have no issue with murder, rape and other crimes while at the same time claiming to be Christians. And yes, this is also without mentioning the comparatively small number of Muslims who are also loyal to Rome flooding into the USA that will vote on the left for the Pope, and this is especially true when it comes to Sharia law.

That all being said, one can see why students of prophecy have been trying to warn as many as they could about Obama and His Vatican puppeteer the last 7.5 years. No, we never warn people expecting a change in the political landscape, nor do we suggest who to vote for because we all know there are never any candidates worth voting for. No, we warn the people because Christian prophecy WILL be fulfilled and that being the case, it will happen as the Bible warns and we all need to make our paths straight NOW! Rome will have the power she needs in America to enforce her mark. We all have God's Word on that!

Michigan Professor seeks ‘Blacks-only’ nation in South

"A black professor who teaches at Michigan has publicly called for the segregation of five states, saying the separation of blacks from whites and other races in select spots would be “fairly easy” to accomplish. “There are large sections of the United States that have nothing but black people in them already,” said University of Michigan political science professor Christian Davenport, in an interview with the Atlanta Black Star. “There are cults and militias as well as private corporations that do whatever they want behind their closed doors.” Davenport also said that “in New York and Chicago … organizations like the Nation of Islam occupy decent-size areas in American cities,” the Daily Caller reported. “The idea,” he went on, “of black folk coming together thus does not seem that difficult to me. …The People’s New Black Panther Party is reportedly among the groups pushing for a “government in a nation within a nation. …We just need to start migrating back to those states and taking control of the economics in those states,”Omowale told reporter Aaron Klein. “If black people move in, most definitely white people will move out. So it’s not a hard process for us to have our own country within a country." –Source

This is one angry man, and yes he is boldly racist to boot. As far as anyone with morals can tell, his ideology is not very good. However, if one political leader with a chip on his shoulder ran with this, and there are many out there with chips like his as we speak, I am sure he could get many more to join in and it could literally come to fruition. But not in the fashion this hateful professor is proposing. Satan can build on his kind of hate wherein if it was possible to get all the blacks into one area of the country, how hard would it be for our government leaders to blast them into oblivion with the use of one or two nukes or even a preplanned false flag disaster at a nearby power plant? Getting all the opposing people in one area is something every corrupt politician dreams of wherein he could eliminate all political opposition in one fell swoop. I've always wondered why the government hasn't already forced Christians into such an area as of yet. But then we do have the ever ready FEMA camps just waiting for the other shoe to drop. I did a Newsletter on them back in 2006 wherein I showed just how many were set up at that time. Back then the number was around 600 camps. After ten years I am sure that number has at least doubled. So as crazy as it seems for what this racist professor suggests, our government is already prepared to relocate people en masse. In, fact, I did a Newsletter back in January of 1999 that was a repeat of a Newsletter I did first offline that shared some Executive Orders and how they were worded. Three such orders are as follows:

  • E.O. #11000 – Seizure of all American people for work forces under federal supervision, including the splitting up of families if the government has to.
  • E.O. #11002 – Empowers the Postmaster General to register all men, women, and children in the Federal Government.
  • E.O. #11004 – Seizure of all housing and finance authorities, to establish forced relocation. Designates areas to be abandoned "unsafe," establishes new locations for populations, relocates communities, build new housing with public funds.

And just so you know, it was Roman Catholic John F Kennedy that wrote those orders and William J Clinton that gave them life during his Jesuit controlled presidency.

Truth is, the United States government has been attacking the black community since day one. And I'm not talking about the slavery abomination either. Yes, slavery was bad when wielded in the hands of Neanderthal racists, but if the slavery in America was more like the slavery was in Scripture, it would not have been so bad. And no I am not suggesting we legalize slavery. Today's definition is far from the ancient one mentioned in Scripture. When you do a study on the biblical term 'slavery' you see it's more like the modern term "employee" today. But like any time in history, those with power thrust upon them when the money begins to flow and fear of the people grows, as we saw with the Jews in Egypt, they usually have a tendency to act up and viciously beat, rape and kill their slaves. But my point regarding the United States government being racist is the fact that the government funded abortion clinics to this day are found in more inner cities and black neighborhoods than any others. More black babies are killed than any other race in America. This is no more a mistake than all the well-stocked liquor stores popping up on every street corner in black communities as well as the lackadaisical attitude of the government towards black on black crime. The powers that be are doing all they can to drag down the black community as well as look the other way while they kill each other. And by the way, Margaret Sanger, the founder of Planned Parenthood said the following. "We don't want the word to get out that we want to exterminate the Negro population." -Planned Parenthood Founder Margaret Sanger December 19, 1939. And to this day her organization is funded by the United States Government across the board to abort millions of black babies annually!

And it gets worse?

Years ago NBC did a story on the Government's sterilization program that lasted in North Carolina form 1929 to 1974 wherein the government sterilized thousands of young boys and girls. It was so successful that it spread to 31 States in America that lead to tens of thousands of children and young adults being sterilized by force. At first it was all races being sterilized that came from low income families. But by the 1960's it shifted towards focusing on blacks alone. And so, having all the blacks segregated to one area of the nation as this racist Michigan professor suggests does not sound like a good idea at all. It will make their extinction that much easier and with that said, this professor is nothing more than a mouthpiece towards that end if in fact anyone with power is moved by the same demon that moved his tongue to suggest such a thing in the first place.

In any event, one thing is plain here. Hatred for our fellow man, be it over race, ethnicity, religiosity or something as simple as jealousy over the new car in one's driveway is at an all-time high just as Jesus prophesied it would be when He said in Matthew 24:12, "And because iniquity shall abound, the love of many shall wax cold."

One last thing:

For all those racists out there that claim to be Christians that can't seem to get along with their fellow man because their skin is not the same color as theirs. How I ask are you ever going to be able to get along with all those Christians standing in New Jerusalem that came from every nation on earth? Bottom line is, if you can't love them down here, you won't be allowed in the City, who's Owner and Builder is in fact the God of love.

Gingrich calls for deportation of those who ‘believe in Shariah’

"Newt Gingrich, former speaker of the House and talked-about pick for Donald Trump’s vice presidential slot, said on Fox News while discussing the Nice, France, terrorist attack that the United States ought to implement a testing system to root out Shariah-compliant Muslims and deport them. On “Hannity,” Gingrich said the country “should frankly test every person here who is of a Muslim background, and if they believe in Shariah, they should be deported. Shariah is incompatible with Western civilization.” –Source

That's all well and good, in fact it's true.. for the most part anyway. What I mean is, Shariah law is not compatible with Western civilization. But the entire truth is, it's incompatible with any civilization in that it causes many to die for reasons no man, woman or child should ever have to die. Still, Gingrich said what he said so as to make his position on all this clear.

But is it clear?

Looking into prophecy we know all about the soon to come beheadings of Christians who refuse to bow to the Roman Catholic Church's demands when it comes to their mixing church and State powers to bring about religious law. That being of course Sunday laws. That being the case, demanding every Muslim be deported that believes in a law that must become part of the law of the land in all nations when it comes to the mark of the beast is as believable as the last 266 popes who claimed they will put an end to child molestation.

No, we may not see Shariah law as it is written verbatim in the Vatican inspired Koran, but we will see the one dogmatic demand that nonbelievers be beheaded. This prophesied fact will most assuredly have to be implemented into the laws of the land if they are ever going to be able to enforce that mark. And that land will eventually encompass all ten regions of the planet, or as the prophet Daniel described as "ten toes" in that dream of the king he mentioned in Daniel chapter two.

Just as Roman Catholic Jesuit coadjutor Alex Jones likes to play the part as the man in our corner so as to paint a picture of peace and safety, when in fact he is nothing but a loyal fabricator for the Pope and his agenda, Newt Gingrich is still a politician and like all politicians will say and do whatever it takes to CULTivate a following. After all, Gingrich is himself a recent convert to Roman Catholicism and so political posturing that benefits Rome will most assuredly be in his bag of tricks if in fact he seeks to keep his position and gain higher posts of duty in the future.

One last thing

 Anyone that has researched Islam knows all about the word "al-Taqiyya" of Islam which translated means: "In Islam taqiyya تقية (alternative spellings taqiyeh,taqiya, taqiyah, tuqyah) is a form of religious dissimulation, or a legaldispensation whereby a believing individual can deny his faith or commit otherwise illegal or blasphemous acts while they are at risk of significant persecution." –"Taqiyah". Oxford Dictionary of Islam. John L. Esposito, Ed. OxfordUniversity Press. 2003. Retrieved 25 May 2011.

I also found on Muslimfact.com that "Muslims are permitted to lie: (1) to save their lives, (2) to reconcile a husband and wife, (3) to persuade a woman into a bedroom and (4) to facilitate one on his journey. Muslims are even permitted to disavow Islam and Mohammed if it is not a genuine heart-felt rejection. Muslims will tell you that concealment of a truth is not an abandonment of that truth if it benefits Islam." –Source

Convenient isn't it? It also reeks of the long prophesied Roman Catholic lackadaisical fruit wherein they can be saved IN sin rather than FROM sin and so anything goes as long as the end justifies the means. Now do you see why Obama has no problem claiming to be a Christian while still being considered a Muslim in good standings with the Imams and Islamic leaders he bows to on camera?

In other words, as Newt Gingrich knows, if you ask any obedient Muslim the question, "do you believe in Shariah law?" All of them see no problem with lying to prevent persecution. So how can you tell the difference between those that do and those that don't? Basic reality is, being deported would be a form of persecution for them and so they will lie through their teeth. If Gingrich was sincere and not using the 'craftiness' card the prophet Daniel speaks of that is so apparent of Gingrich's Vatican prelates; he would not ask the Muslims any questions at all. He would simply close all Mosques and deport all members.

In short… the Muslims aren't going anywhere. And even if the media fabricated a mass exodus of Muslims from American shores, they will still be in high political positions ready, willing and able to pull the lever that drops the blade upon the neck of the obedient bride of Christ that refuses to disobey their ever living and ever loving Heavenly Father.